.jpg)
For decades, VPNs served as the standard solution for remote access security. They provided a straightforward approach: create an encrypted tunnel between remote users and the corporate network, effectively extending the network perimeter to include remote locations. This model worked reasonably well when remote work was occasional and most business activity happened within physical offices.
Today's reality is radically different. Remote and hybrid work have become permanent fixtures of business operations. Employees work from homes, coffee shops, airports, and hotels. They access cloud applications that don't even reside within corporate networks. They use multiple devices and switch between them throughout the day. The traditional network perimeter has dissolved.
VPN technology hasn't kept pace with this transformation. While VPNs still provide value in specific scenarios, they were designed for a world that no longer exists. Their fundamental architecture creates security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and user experience problems that modern alternatives solve far more effectively.
Zero Trust remote access represents a fundamentally different approach. Rather than extending network trust to remote locations, Zero Trust assumes that no connection is inherently trustworthy. Every access request must be authenticated, authorized, and encrypted, regardless of where it originates. Users receive access to specific applications and resources, not to entire networks.
Understanding the differences between these approaches and knowing which best serves your organization's needs is critical for Ohio businesses serious about remote work security.
How Traditional VPNs Work
VPN technology creates an encrypted tunnel between a remote device and your corporate network. When an employee connects to your VPN, their device authenticates against a VPN concentrator, typically using a username and password, possibly supplemented with a second authentication factor.
Once authenticated, the VPN client encrypts all network traffic and sends it through the tunnel to your VPN concentrator. The concentrator decrypts the traffic and forwards it to its destination within your network. Return traffic follows the reverse path: encrypted by the concentrator, sent through the tunnel, and decrypted by the client.
From the network's perspective, the remote device appears to be locally connected. It receives an internal IP address and can typically access the same resources available to devices physically present in your office.
This model offers genuine benefits. The encryption protects data in transit from interception. The internal IP addressing simplifies network management. The familiar "connect and work" experience requires minimal user training.
But these benefits come with significant costs and create serious security vulnerabilities that weren't obvious when remote work was occasional rather than constant.
The Security Problems with Traditional VPNs
Broad Network Access After Authentication
The fundamental security problem with VPNs is that authentication happens once at the beginning of the session. Once a user successfully authenticates, they typically receive broad access to internal resources for the duration of their VPN session.
This creates an enormous vulnerability. If an attacker compromises a user's credentials through phishing, keylogging, or credential stuffing, they can authenticate to your VPN and immediately gain access to your internal network. From there, they can move laterally, access sensitive data, install malware, and establish persistence.
According to Verizon's Data Breach Investigations Report, 86% of breaches involve stolen credentials. Traditional VPNs make stolen credentials extraordinarily valuable because a single compromised account provides network-level access.
No Visibility into Device Security Posture
When a device connects to your VPN, you typically have limited visibility into its security status. Is the antivirus up to date? Is the operating system patched? Has the device been compromised with malware that's now sitting dormant, waiting for a VPN connection to provide access to valuable targets?
Most VPN solutions provide minimal device health checking. They verify that the VPN client is installed and can authenticate the user, but they don't comprehensively assess whether the device meets security requirements.
This blind trust in connecting devices creates risk. A compromised laptop connecting to your VPN becomes a vehicle for introducing malware into your network. An unpatched device becomes an entry point for exploiting known vulnerabilities.
Lateral Movement After Breach
Once an attacker gains VPN access, traditional network architectures often allow lateral movement between systems. If your internal network operates on the assumption that anything inside the perimeter is trustworthy, a compromised VPN account provides access far beyond what that specific user should have.
Attackers exploit this implicit trust to move from the initially compromised account to more valuable targets. They scan for additional vulnerabilities, escalate privileges, and establish multiple points of access throughout your network. By the time you detect the breach, they've already accomplished their objectives.
Performance and Scalability Issues
VPNs create performance bottlenecks that become severe at scale. All traffic from remote users must route through VPN concentrators before reaching its destination. This backhauling adds latency, consumes bandwidth, and creates single points of failure.
When your entire workforce works remotely, VPN concentrators struggle under the load. Users experience slow connections, dropped sessions, and inability to connect during peak hours. These performance issues frustrate users and encourage them to bypass security controls by finding alternative ways to access what they need.
Complexity in Cloud-First Environments
Modern businesses increasingly rely on cloud-based applications and services. When remote users access cloud applications through a VPN, their traffic takes an inefficient path: from their location to your VPN concentrator, then out to the cloud application, and back along the same route.
This trombone routing adds unnecessary latency and consumes your internet bandwidth without providing security benefits. The cloud application doesn't reside within your network perimeter, so routing traffic through your VPN doesn't actually protect it. You're adding complexity and degrading performance without improving security.
Understanding Zero Trust Architecture
Zero Trust represents a fundamental shift in security philosophy. Rather than drawing a line between trusted internal networks and untrusted external networks, Zero Trust assumes that no connection is inherently trustworthy.
The core principles of Zero Trust include:
Verify Every Access Request
Every connection attempt requires authentication and authorization, regardless of where it originates. A user sitting in your office connects to applications using the same verification process as a user connecting from a coffee shop across the country.
This eliminates the privileged status of being "inside" the network. Network location becomes irrelevant to access decisions.
Least Privilege Access
Users receive access only to the specific resources they need for their current task. If an accountant needs to access the financial system, they receive access to that application, not to the entire network. They certainly don't receive access to the manufacturing system, the customer database, or the human resources application.
This principle dramatically reduces the impact of compromised credentials. Even if an attacker steals a legitimate user's credentials, they can only access the limited resources that user has permission to use.
Assume Breach
Zero Trust architecture operates on the assumption that your environment is already compromised or will be compromised eventually. This mindset shifts security focus from prevention alone to include detection and response.
Systems continuously monitor for anomalous behavior that might indicate compromise. When suspicious activity is detected, automated responses can limit the damage by revoking access, isolating affected systems, and alerting security teams.
Continuous Verification
Authentication doesn't happen just once at the beginning of a session. Zero Trust systems continuously verify that connections remain legitimate throughout their duration.
If a user's behavior suddenly changes (accessing unusual resources, connecting from a new location, downloading large amounts of data), the system can require re-authentication, reduce privileges, or terminate the session entirely.
How Zero Trust Remote Access Works
Zero Trust remote access solutions operate very differently from traditional VPNs. Instead of creating a tunnel to your network, they broker individual connections between users and specific applications.
When a user needs to access a business application, they connect to a Zero Trust access service. This service authenticates the user, verifies the device meets security requirements, evaluates the access request against policy, and if approved, creates an encrypted connection directly between the user's device and the specific application they need.
The user never receives access to your network. They don't get an internal IP address. They can't see other resources on your network or move laterally to systems they shouldn't access. They simply connect to the specific application they need, and that's all.
This architecture provides several advantages. It eliminates the broad network access that makes VPNs so vulnerable. It enables granular access control based on user identity, device posture, and contextual factors. It performs better because traffic flows directly between users and applications without backhauling through concentrators.
Zero Trust security platforms implement this model and provide the infrastructure needed to secure remote access in modern distributed work environments.
VPN vs Zero Trust: Key Differences
Understanding the practical differences between these approaches helps clarify which solution fits your needs.
Trust Model
VPNs operate on a perimeter-based trust model. Once you're inside the perimeter (authenticated to the VPN), you're generally trusted. Zero Trust operates on a model of never trust, always verify. Being authenticated gets you access to specific resources you're authorized for, nothing more.
Access Granularity
VPNs typically provide network-level access. You connect to the network and then access resources within it. Zero Trust provides application-level access. You receive permission to use specific applications without ever connecting to the underlying network.
Device Health Verification
VPNs often perform limited device health checks, if any. Zero Trust systems comprehensively verify device posture before granting access and continuously monitor device status throughout sessions.
Performance Characteristics
VPNs backhaul all traffic through concentrators, creating bottlenecks and adding latency. Zero Trust solutions enable direct connections between users and applications, improving performance and reducing bandwidth consumption.
User Experience
VPNs require users to remember to connect before accessing resources, and users often experience slow performance or connection issues. Zero Trust solutions can provide transparent access where users simply launch applications without thinking about networking, and performance is typically better because of efficient traffic routing.
Security Effectiveness
VPNs create a large attack surface because compromised credentials provide broad network access. Zero Trust dramatically reduces attack surface through least privilege access and continuous verification.
When VPNs Still Make Sense
Despite their limitations, VPNs remain appropriate for specific scenarios.
Legacy Application Access
If you have legacy applications that can't be integrated with modern authentication systems, VPNs may be your only option for secure remote access. Some older systems simply weren't designed for the authentication methods Zero Trust requires.
Site-to-Site Connectivity
When connecting entire networks together (branch offices to headquarters, for example), traditional VPNs or SD-WAN solutions often make more sense than Zero Trust architecture designed for user access.
Simple Environments with Few Users
If you have a very small team, limited remote access needs, and simple security requirements, a VPN might be adequate. The complexity and cost of Zero Trust solutions may not be justified for organizations with just a handful of remote users accessing simple applications.
Budget Constraints
VPN solutions are often less expensive to implement than comprehensive Zero Trust platforms, especially in the short term. If budget is severely constrained and you need immediate remote access capability, a VPN might be your only realistic option.
However, the long-term costs of VPNs (management overhead, performance issues, security incidents) often exceed the upfront cost savings. And for organizations with significant remote workforces, VPNs quickly become inadequate.
Implementing Zero Trust Remote Access
Transitioning from VPN to Zero Trust remote access requires planning and phased implementation.
Assess Your Current Environment
Start by understanding what you have today. Document all applications that remote users need to access. Identify which users need access to which applications. Map the current network architecture and access paths.
Evaluate your existing authentication infrastructure. Zero Trust relies heavily on strong authentication and identity management. If your current identity systems are inadequate, you'll need to upgrade them as part of your Zero Trust implementation.
Define Access Policies
Zero Trust requires explicit policies that define who can access what under which conditions. This policy definition is more detailed than what most VPN configurations require.
For each application, specify which users or groups should have access. Define the conditions under which access is permitted (device compliance requirements, geographic restrictions, time-based limitations). Establish monitoring and logging requirements.
This policy work takes time but provides enormous value. The process of explicitly defining access requirements often reveals overly broad permissions that create unnecessary risk.
Prioritize Application Migration
You don't need to migrate everything to Zero Trust simultaneously. Start with applications that provide the most value or present the highest risk.
High-value targets include applications accessed by large numbers of remote users, applications containing sensitive data, and applications that have experienced security incidents in the past.
Consider starting with cloud-based applications since they're often easier to integrate with Zero Trust platforms than on-premises systems.
Implement Strong Authentication
Zero Trust requires robust authentication. Implement multi-factor authentication for all users. Consider passwordless authentication options like biometrics or hardware tokens that eliminate the password vulnerability entirely.
Integrate your authentication systems with your Zero Trust platform so access decisions can be based on verified identity rather than just network location.
Deploy Device Health Verification
Implement tools that assess and enforce device compliance. Define minimum security requirements (antivirus status, patch levels, disk encryption) and configure your Zero Trust platform to verify these requirements before granting access.
For environments that allow BYOD, remote endpoint protection becomes even more critical. You need visibility into device security status regardless of whether you own the device.
Monitor and Refine
Zero Trust is not a one-time implementation. Continuously monitor access patterns, security events, and user behavior. Use this information to refine your policies and improve security posture.
Look for anomalous behavior that might indicate compromised credentials or insider threats. Configure automated responses that can contain threats quickly when suspicious activity is detected.
Cost Considerations
The financial comparison between VPN and Zero Trust is more nuanced than simple licensing costs.
Upfront Costs
VPN solutions often have lower upfront costs, especially if you're implementing basic VPN functionality using existing firewalls or routers. Zero Trust platforms typically require more significant initial investment in licensing and implementation services.
However, VPNs at scale require expensive concentrator hardware, and high-availability configurations multiply these costs. Zero Trust solutions delivered as cloud services often eliminate hardware costs entirely.
Operational Costs
VPNs require ongoing management: troubleshooting connection issues, upgrading concentrator capacity, managing client software across diverse devices. These operational costs are substantial, especially as your remote workforce grows.
Zero Trust solutions often have lower operational overhead because they eliminate VPN client management, reduce troubleshooting burden, and handle scaling automatically in cloud-based deployments.
Security Costs
VPNs' security limitations often lead to breaches that carry enormous costs. The average data breach costs $4.88 million according to IBM, and remote work-related breaches add an additional $173,000 to this cost.
Zero Trust's superior security posture reduces breach risk and the associated costs. For organizations serious about security, the risk reduction alone often justifies Zero Trust's higher upfront costs.
Productivity Costs
VPN performance problems frustrate users and reduce productivity. When users waste time connecting to VPNs, troubleshooting slow connections, or working around VPN limitations, you pay a productivity tax that's hard to quantify but very real.
Zero Trust solutions typically improve user experience and eliminate VPN-related productivity losses.
Migration Strategies
Moving from VPN to Zero Trust doesn't require rip-and-replace. Hybrid approaches allow gradual transition.
Parallel Operation
Run Zero Trust and VPN solutions simultaneously during transition. Migrate applications and users to Zero Trust incrementally while maintaining VPN access for systems not yet migrated.
This reduces risk and allows you to validate that Zero Trust configurations work correctly before decommissioning VPN infrastructure.
Application-by-Application Migration
Migrate applications to Zero Trust one at a time. Start with less critical applications to gain experience with the platform and work out any issues before migrating mission-critical systems.
This phased approach spreads costs over time and allows users to gradually adapt to the new access model.
User Group Migration
Another approach migrates users in groups rather than applications. Start with tech-savvy users who can provide feedback and help troubleshoot issues. Gradually expand to less technical users as the system matures.
This allows you to refine processes and documentation before rolling out to your entire organization.
Integration with Other Security Controls
Zero Trust remote access works best when integrated with other security controls.
Managed Endpoint Detection and Response (MDR) provides the device health visibility that Zero Trust access decisions require. MDR monitors endpoints for compromise and can automatically update device health status used by Zero Trust platforms to make access decisions.
Firewall monitoring and management complements Zero Trust by providing network-level visibility and control. Even with application-level access control, network security remains important for detecting and blocking malicious traffic.
For organizations allowing personal devices, BYOD security policies define the framework within which Zero Trust operates. Clear policies about acceptable device types, security requirements, and data handling create the foundation for technical enforcement through Zero Trust platforms.
The Future of Remote Access Security
Remote access security continues to evolve beyond even today's Zero Trust implementations.
SASE Convergence
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) platforms converge Zero Trust remote access with network security functions like firewall, secure web gateway, and data loss prevention into unified cloud-based services.
This convergence simplifies architecture, improves performance, and provides consistent security regardless of where users connect from or what resources they access.
AI-Enhanced Access Decisions
Artificial intelligence and machine learning increasingly influence access control decisions. Systems analyze user behavior patterns to detect anomalies that might indicate compromise. They adjust access privileges dynamically based on risk assessment.
These AI-enhanced systems can identify subtle indicators of compromise that static policies would miss and respond faster than human analysts could.
Passwordless and Continuous Authentication
The future eliminates passwords entirely. Continuous authentication using biometrics, behavioral analysis, and device attestation verifies identity throughout sessions without requiring users to repeatedly enter credentials.
This improves both security (eliminating password vulnerabilities) and user experience (reducing authentication friction).
Making the Right Choice for Your Organization
The decision between VPN and Zero Trust depends on your specific circumstances, but the trend is clear: Zero Trust represents the future of remote access security.
If you're implementing remote access for the first time or expanding remote access to support a significantly larger workforce, Zero Trust is almost certainly the right choice. Its superior security, better performance, and improved user experience justify the investment.
If you have an existing VPN implementation serving a small number of users with simple needs, you may be able to continue with it in the short term. But plan for eventual migration to Zero Trust as your remote workforce grows or your security requirements increase.
For Ohio businesses serious about securing distributed teams, Zero Trust security platforms provide the foundation for long-term success. They align security architecture with the reality of modern work environments where network perimeters no longer exist and remote access is the norm rather than the exception.
The question is not whether to adopt Zero Trust but when and how to implement it in a way that balances security improvements with operational realities and budget constraints.
